Biden warns Supreme Court’s Trump immunity ruling sets ‘dangerous precedent’: Live

Former Ohio Democratic Rep Tim Ryan has called for Vice President Kamala Harris to take over as the party’s 2024 nominee from President Joe Biden.

Ryan once had a short-lived 2020 presidential campaign, lost a race to become a senator in Ohio to JD Vance in 2022 and was in Congress for 20 years from 2003.

Writing in Newsweek, Ryan said: “I ran for President in 2020. I was the first Presidential candidate to endorse Joe Biden in 2020. I love America. I love our Party. I love Joe Biden.”

“The Democratic Nominee in 2024 should be Kamala Harris,” he continued.

“Joe Biden’s debate performance was deeply troubling. But it isn’t just about a 90-minute debate and a terrible performance. This election needs to be about generational change—something about which I have been shouting for more than a year now.”

Ryan lists all of Biden’s qualities and his record of connecting with voters but notes that he also promised to be the bridge to the next generation.

“Regrettably, that bridge collapsed last week. Witnessing Joe Biden struggle was heartbreaking. And we must forge a new path forward. After deep reflection over these past few days, I strongly believe that our best path forward is Kamala Harris.”

He argues that she would carry a more convincing Democratic message than Biden, especially on abortion, and would “energize the Black, brown, and Asian Pacific members of our coalition. (Read Philadelphia, Atlanta, Detroit, Charlotte, Miami and Milwaukee.)”

Ryan also argues she would bring dispirited young people back into the fold; both Democratic and Republican suburban women would be more comfortable with her than Trump or Biden; and her presence on the top of the ticket would help Democrats in swing districts.

In conclusion, he writes that the American people want a future of renewal and reform: “That future begins with Kamala Harris. I hope the powers that be in our party have the guts and vision to make that happen.”

California governor Gavin Newsom will headline a Democratic campaign event in New Hampshire next Monday, Fox News reports.

The July 8 event is called the “Blue Summer Campaign Kick-Off” and being organised by the New Hampshire House and Senate Democrats and will inevitably heighten speculation that Newsom is preparing to take over his party’s presidential nomination from the ailing Joe Biden.

“We look forward to welcoming Governor Newsom to New Hampshire to campaign on behalf of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris as we work to once again defeat Donald Trump,” New Hampshire Democratic Party chair Ray Buckley said in a statement.

”Trump has grown increasingly unhinged in his campaign for power,” Buckley stressed, arguing that “it’s never been more important to mobilize Democrats across the state to defeat him and re-elect our President, Joe Biden, who has consistently fought for and delivered for New Hampshire.”

Newsom notably stood up for Biden after last week’s disaster in Atlanta, which the California man attended in person, and was rebuked for doing so by the likes of MSNBC pundit Joe Scarborough, who accused him of having his head in the sand.

Melania Trump is unlikely to take up the role of full-time first lady if her husband wins a second term as president, according to a report.

A Trumpworld insider told Page Six that the Slovenian former model has cut a deal with Donald Trump that if he takes back the White House in November she would not have to be on first lady duty 24/7.

Ultimately, Melania believes she can be “hands-on mother and first lady at the same time,” the insider told Page Six.

“She does not want a non-stop schedule of events in the White House, and makes the point she can be both a hands-on mother and First Lady at the same time.

“Donald is close to Barron, but isn’t going to tossing footballs with him when he’s the president and the head of the free world. Donald has already agreed to this, and feels that mothers and parents across the country will understand Melania’s devotion to their son,” they added.

James Liddell and Alex Woodward have this look at one of the key questions of the day.

No indeed Mike Johnson, I certainly can’t think of any recent American president who might be tempted into abusing their powers for sordid personal gain.

No siree, not one name springs to mind, can’t think of a soul to whom that might apply…

Full marks to the commentator responding to Will Scharf here.

Justice Clarence Thomas joined the Supreme Court’s five other conservatives to grant Trump and other presidents unprecedented immunity from criminal prosecution.

But he also wrote his own opinion taking aim at the special counsel handling the election interference case at the center of the ruling – days after Trump’s attorneys made the same arguments in a Florida courtroom.

Thomas went so far as to say that the federal judge overseeing Trump’s election interference case should reconsider whether Jack Smith was even lawfully appointed to the job, giving Trump and the judge presiding over Trump’s classified documents case more legal ammunition in his favor.

“If this unprecedented prosecution is to proceed, it must be conducted by someone duly authorized to do so by the American people,” Justice Thomas wrote.

“The lower courts should thus answer these essential questions concerning the Special Counsel’s appointment before proceeding.”

Over seven pages, he goes on to argue against the appointment of special counsels, laying the groundwork for more challenges to Smith’s authority while Trump and his allies undermine his office in court and in Congress.

New York Democrat Joe Morelle is pledging action in an attempt to overturn the conservative justices’ “harmful” decision yesterday.

From the same patch, AOC has also been talking up impeachment.

Attorneys for Trump have reportedly sent a letter to the judge overseeing his hush money trial in New York in the hopes of delaying his sentencing and blocking his guilty verdict in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that grants him some immunity from prosecution.

The letter, first reported by The New York Times, arrived shortly after a ruling from the nation’s high court that shields Trump and any other president from criminal prosecution for actions considered “official” duties while in office.

The Supreme Court’s monumental decision on whether Trump is shielded from criminal prosecution for his actions in office will likely derail his election interference trial.

Alex Woodward takes a closer look.