Michael Phelps says US athletes losing faith in Wada before Paris Olympics

US Olympic athletes have lost faith in the World Anti-Doping Agency to rid their sports of cheaters before next month’s summer Games in Paris, two former gold medalists told a House subcommittee on Tuesday night.

The testimony by Michael Phelps and Allison Schmitt followed revelations this spring that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive for a banned heart medication before the Tokyo Olympics in 2021 but were allowed by Wada to compete. Five of those swimmers went on to win medals, including three golds.

Phelps is the most decorated swimmer in history and a 23-time Olympic gold medalist. Schmitt, a four-time gold medalist, was part of the US 800-meter freestyle relay team that finished a close second to China at the Tokyo Games. Both the Chinese and US teams broke the previous world record in the relay.

“We raced hard. We trained hard. We followed every protocol. We accepted our defeat with grace,” Schmitt said. “Many of us will be haunted by this podium finish that may have been impacted by doping.”

Eleven of the Chinese swimmers who tested positive before Tokyo will compete again in Paris. Phelps nodded in agreement multiple times as members of Congress criticized Wada and said Americans should be able to watch the Olympics without wondering if the competition is rigged.

“As athletes, our faith can no longer be blindly placed in the World Anti-Doping Agency, an organisation that continues to prove that it is either incapable or unwilling to enforce its policies consistently around the world,” Phelps said.

Phelps expressed frustration that nothing had changed since he testified before the same subcommittee seven years ago about Wada’s handling of Russian state-sponsored doping. “Sitting here once again, it is clear to me that any attempts of reform at Wada have fallen short, and there are still deeply rooted, systemic problems that prove detrimental to the integrity of international sports and athletes’ right to fair competition, time and time again,” Phelps said. “Honestly, if we continue to let this slide any farther, the Olympic Games might not even be there.”

The global doping regulator accepted Chinese anti-doping officials’ conclusion that the 23 athletes had ingested the banned substance through contaminated food at a hotel. Independent anti-doping experts have questioned that finding, with US Anti-Doping Agency CEO Travis Tygart calling it “outrageous.”

“The banned drug, which is only available in pill form, somehow ended up in the kitchen of a hotel the swimmers were staying at,” said Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a representative from Washington, adding that Wada “somehow concluded this explanation was plausible.”

Wada said Covid-19 pandemic restrictions in China prevented an “on the ground probe” of the positive tests and concluded that it could not disprove Chinese authorities’ explanation.

Wada president Witold Bańka was invited to testify on Tuesday but declined. “Unfortunately, there persists a narrative from some in the US suggesting that Wada somehow acted inappropriately or showed bias towards China, despite there being no evidence to support that theory,” Banka said in a statement. “Wada understands the tense relationship that exists between the governments of China and US and has no mandate to be part of that. It is not appropriate for anti-doping to be politicized in this way.”

In response to criticism, Wada appointed an independent investigator, Swiss prosecutor Eric Cottier, to review its handling of the China case. Cottier was appointed on 25 April and was expected to deliver his findings within two months. His appointment, too, angered critics who said his pointed to conflicts of interest.

The US contributes more funding to Wada than any other country, including nearly $3.7m this year. China has given Wada $1.8m more than its required dues since 2018, Tygart noted in his testimony.

Tygart called on the US to condition its future funding of Wada on reforms at the agency, an idea that Republican and Democratic lawmakers said they supported. “I think the threat of that if not actually suspending [funding] for a period of time will go a long way to influence the truth getting out,” Tygart said. “We should ensure that our money is going for a good purpose and right now it’s absolutely not.”